Right
of Reply by Mr. Yasantha Kodagoda, Deputy Solicitor General
Member of the Delegation of the Government of Sri Lanka,
under Agenda item “ Urgent situations warranting
the attention of the
Human Rights Council”
Mr.
Yasantha Kodagoda,
Deputy Solicitor General
14th March 2008
Mr.
President,
My
delegation would like to exercise the right of reply in
connection with certain statements made under agenda item
number 4.
It
is indeed my government’s view that certain situations
affecting the Human Rights of individuals and groups of
people living in various countries around the world, in
fact demand the urgent attention of the Human Rights Council.
However, if we as members of the international community
are not objective in our expositions on situations which
warrant the urgent attention of this Council, do not act
in good faith, use this agenda item to give effect to hidden
political or other agendas, and are not consistent and proportionate
in our expositions, this agenda item of the Human Rights
Council would also be reduced to another round of political
rhetoric and a frivolous and useless game of naming and
shaming.
Indeed
Mr. President, conspicuous by its absence was reference
under this agenda item, by certain segments of the international
community, to the prevailing appalling and pathetic situation
in Gaza and to the situation faced by people of Palestine
. If that situation is not a dangerous situation which warrants
the urgent attention by this assembly, I would remain unable
to comprehend what situation is in fact dangerous.
It
is under these circumstances Mr. President that Sri Lanka
feels that this round of debate of the Council has also
now been reduced to mere political naming and shaming based
on narrow neo-colonial political ambitions being exercised
by a small segment of the international community without
objectivity and empathy. If this situation continues to
prevail in this Council, we are indeed concerned that this
Council will also be reduced to a international political
‘talk-shop’ without serving the people who indeed
require the attention of this Council.
Mr.
President, we as representatives of our country, are indeed
committed at developing sustainable, indigenous and efficacious
solutions for the resolution of the problems faced by Sri
Lanka including in particular the persistent efforts by
the most ruthless international terrorist organization in
the world, the LTTE, to establish a (mono-ethnic, mono-political)
separate sovereign State in the northern and eastern provinces
of Sri Lanka.
Successive
governments of Sri Lanka have for over three decades attempted
to engage the LTTE and other Tamil groups with the view
to developing a political and constitutional solution to
the country’s ethnic conflict. However, the LTTE has
up to now on four different occasions walked out of peace
talks and resumed terrorist activities.
At
a time when Sri Lanka’s very existence as a unitary
sovereign State is being seriously threatened by ruthless
and dangerous terrorism. What in fact would you suggest
the Sri Lankan government to do, other than to exercise
legitimate military action aimed at thwarting the advancement
of terrorist activities and eliminating terrorism?
So
that the writ of the government could be exercised in all
parts of the country enabling the government to efficaciously
govern the entire country for the benefit of all people
of Sri Lanka.
Mr.
President, there were several delegates who suggested at
this assembly that the government of Sri Lanka negotiates
with the LTTE. May I simply ask one question from such delegates.
Would they ever dare to make such a recommendation to world
powers, and suggest that such world powers negotiate with
the terrorist organization ‘Al-Qaeda’? May I
ask such delegates whether they see any difference between
the terrorist organization ‘Al-Qaeda’ and the
LTTE? If the only justifiable response to Al-Qaeda terrorism
is military action and political isolation, how is it, Mr.
President, that certain segments of the international community
wishes that the government of Sri Lanka adopt a different
approach to terrorism and ‘negotiate’ with terrorists,
as opposed to eliminating terrorism through lawful military
action?
Mr.
President, in view of suggestions made by certain delegates
in support of the subjective recommendation made by the
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on the establishment
of a UN HR field monitoring mission in Sri Lanka, let me
take this opportunity to reiterate my government’s
opposition to the proposal made by the Madam High Commissioner.
Mr.
President, the UN High Commissioner’s proposal which
was made without applying previously developed, objective
and transparent criteria, is not in our view an efficacious
solution to the Human Rights related problems faced by my
country. We firmly believe that, what is necessary is to
enhance the capacity of existing domestic institutions for
the proper monitoring of Human Rights associated problems
in Sri Lanka.
We
are indeed encouraged by the fact that there is now a growing
realization by a wide spectrum of the international community
who are sincerely interested in the wellbeing of Sri Lanka,
of the inappropriateness and subjective nature of Madam
High Commissioner’s recommendation.
The
Government of Sri Lanka will with the support of those of
the international community who are genuinely interested
in peace and security of Sri Lanka, and with the untiring
efforts of committed members of the Sri Lankan civil society,
seek to develop sustainable solutions to problems faced
by our country and the people of Sri Lanka, by apply indigenous
solutions for the resolution of our country’s problems.
Mr.
President, the mandate of the International Independent
Group of Eminent Persons (IIGEP) was not terminated by the
government. Only certain Members of that body have intimated
their intention of resigning from it. That institution will
continue to function observing the investigations and inquiries
being conducted by the Commission of Inquiry appointed to
inquire into alleged serious violations of Human Rights.
The Commission of Inquiry will also continue to impartially
and comprehensively investigate and inquire into cases before
the Commission including the killing of the 17 aid workers
of the ACF.
Mr.
President, I assure you that, Sri Lanka will remain a free
and fair sovereign country in which all people of Sri Lanka
will live in a united manner in one and free country.
Thank
you.
|