6.6.2008
The
Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the United Nations Office
at Geneva
06th June 2008
The
religious superiors of the CMRS (Conference of Major Religious
Superiors) have recently sent a letter to the Sri Lankan
government and the Tamil Tigers calling on both parties
to stop all forms of violence and war immediately and enter
into negotiations. This request has also been endorsed by
a statement issued by the JPIC (Justice, Peace and Integrity
of Creation Commission), the Rome-based International Union
of Superiors General. Commenting on the lack of relevance
of such a request at this juncture, Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha,
Secretary-General of the Secretariat for Coordination the
Peace Process, has written the following article:
It
is reported that the Conference of Major Religious Superiors
(CMRS) in Sri Lanka has joined a chorus of calls for 'a
political dialogue to meaningfully resolve the ethnic problem
and bring peace to Sri Lanka.' This could have been seen
as a positive step had the chorus been heard five years
ago, when the LTTE first withdrew from negotiations. It
might even have been helpful two years ago when, in refusing
to come to talks scheduled for April 2006, the LTTE attempted
to blow up the army commander but found no concerted criticism
of its approach. It might even have had some purpose a year
ago, at the time when the Norwegian Ambassador went to Kilinochchi
and was told that the Tigers were unwilling to talk, but
found the world instead sympathetic to the sulks that had
seen off all European Union members of the Monitoring Mission,
which had found the Tigers guilty of so many violations
of the Ceasefire they did not think it necessary to observe
100%.
Given
that the Sri Lankan government has always been ready for
talks, and has said so consistently for over six years,
it would make sense if the chorus addressed itself more
clearly to the Tigers. But no, in a search for balance,
as a Norwegian politician now in opposition put it cynically,
those who have not suffered the corrosive effects of totalitarian
terror put an elected government and a terrorist movement
on a par, they condemn in the same breath both what is obviously
collateral damage and also deliberate targeting of civilians,
they belittle the human rights abuses that occur by refusing
to seek specific remedies for them but instead lump them
together in a persistent desire to impose external solutions
upon a sovereign country.
So
too the Religious Superiors make a request, obviously from
the government, to 'Remove the existing embargo on travel
and transport on humanitarian aid workers and allow relief
items to reach the displaced in the camps', obviously not
aware that there is no such embargo, and that relief items
do reach the displaced. There are certainly limitations
on travel and transport, but these are essential in a context
in which instruments of terror are cunningly transported,
even in the vehicles of ecclesiastics.
Though
the superior sorts of Religious personnel are not likely
to get involved in such pursuits, they have to remember
that blackmail and terror can affect even the spiritual,
and people sometimes need protection from themselves, as
the Church has proclaimed over the centuries.
Again,
the Superiors ask that necessary steps be taken 'to stop
paramilitary groups functioning in the north and east and
to disarm them'. It is not clear whether this request is
addressed to the LTTE too, the paramilitary group par excellence,
which decimated all other Tamil groups, the more easily
when they were disarmed in 2002, following the Ceasefire
Agreement. Even at the request of Superiors, there is no
way the Government of Sri Lanka is going to betray Tamils
who have stood out against the LTTE, to allow them to be
slaughtered. Certainly the Superiors should ask that all
these including the LTTE stop functioning as paramilitary
groups, and enter a democratic political process, following
the example of the most Catholic Group of all, the Irish
Republican Army, which finally agreed to decommission arms
so that peace could be pursued. The singling out of more
vulnerable groups is however insidious, given that the Religious
Superiors cannot be ignorant of the bloodshed to which earlier
selective disarming led.
Finally,
it is sad that only now do the Superiors ask 'for the disputed
area around the Our Lady of Madhu Shrine in the northern
diocese of Mannar to be made a "peace zone" and
for the government and rebel forces to stay clear of it.'
No such call was heard when the LTTE used the area for its
weapons and its cadres. No such call was heard when the
Sri Lankan forces had surrounded the shrine, but carefully
refrained from any attack so that there would be no sacrilegious
damage, simply ensuring that the Tigers had finally to withdraw
when supplies failed. No gratitude is now expressed though
the forces, having taken over the shrine, handed it back
to the custody of the Church, which cannot still guarantee
that the Tigers will not return, and hence keep the sacred
statue still far away.
The distinguished Catholic poet Patrick Fernando
wrote
merits of the mass
are infinite; Father Bruno used to say
they encompass even hell, meaning of course,
not to question eternal damnation
but only to drive home a point in class.
Sadly
one gets the impression that, when faced with terror, some
elements of the Catholic hierarchy can only try to drive
home points in class. One hopes they will read the words
of His Holiness the Pope who, in addressing the new Sri
Lankan ambassador to the Vatican, noted that acts of terror
are never justifiable, who raised questions in a spirit
of understanding, who did not condemn a government struggling
against terror but reminded it of its own continuing obligations.
That is a model of how to maintain a proper balance, not
a spurious equalizing of disparate entities.
Prof
Rajiva Wijesinha
Secretary-General
Secretariat for
Coordinating the Peace Process
|