8/5/2007
By Walter Jayawardhana
An
Australian pathologist has denied the report by the Geneva based
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) that Sri Lankan authorities
may have tampered with the evidence connected with the killings
of 17 aid workers connected with a French NGO.
The
Sri Lankan aid workers were killed at the height of the fighting
between the Sri Lanka security forces in August 2006 in Muttur
in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka when the Tamil Tigers invaded
the Muslim majority smaller port town adjacent to Trincomalee.
The
International Commission of Jurists making sensational headlines
all over the world said it had "serious concerns" that
a bullet may have been removed from evidence submitted by investigators
to a Sri Lankan court and used the Australian pathologist report
to substantiate the charge against Sri Lanka.
Minister
of Disaster Management and Human Rights, Mahinda Samarasinghe,
at a news briefing held today (03 August 2007), informed that
in a supplementary report titled "Independent Forensic Investigation
of the Muttur Massacre," Dr. Malcolm Dodd, Consultant Senior
Forensic Pathologist from Australia, has upheld the Sri Lankan
Government Analyst's opinion in the investigations into the ACF
killings in August 2006. Earlier Dr. Dodd had expressed the view
that one of the projectiles recovered from one of the victims
was of a 5.56 calibre, and not of 7.62 calibre as were the rest,
as concluded by the Sri Lankan Government Analyst.
Secretary
of Foreign Affairs, Dr. Palitha Kohona pointed out that the comments
contained in the initial Dodd Report had been used by several
international groups to discredit the Government of Sri Lanka
and to tarnish the image of Sri Lanka. Particular reference was
made to the June 2006 Birnbaum Report (International Commission
of Jurists - Addendum to report: Sri Lanka - The Investigations
and Inquest into the killing of seventeen aid workers in Muttur
in August 2006).
In
June, leading to attacks on Sri Lanka the ICJ said, ""There
is, therefore, evidence to indicate that the 5.56 caliber bullet
was removed from the evidence submitted as exhibits ... and that
another bullet of a different type was substituted."
But
on August 3, at the press conference Sri Lanka's foreign ministry
issued a statement quoting Dodd contradicting the ICJ's evidence-tampering
allegation.
Quoting
the Australian pathologist the Sri Lanka government said as he
was saying, "There is no suggestion in my mind of substitution
of exhibits. To this end, I would categorically refute the suggestion
in that (ICJ) report." The controversy regarding the Muttur
killings arose because the Norwegian peace monitors who were being
widely alleged to be supportive of the LTTE blamed the deaths
on Sri Lankan security forces collaborated by the LTTE while the
Government of Sri Lanka blamed the Tamil Tigers for the massacre.
In
the supplementary report from Dr. Dodd communicated through the
Australian High Commission in Colombo, and received by the Sri
Lankan Ministry of Foreign Affairs August 3, Dr. Dodd has stated
that the presence of "a 5.56 calibre projectile can be confidently
excluded". Dr. Dodd further states that he hopes "this
supplementary report now settles convincingly the issue of calibre
of projectile removed," and "that all projectiles retrieved
from the bodies examined were of the same calibre (7.62)."
Minister
Mahinda Samarasinghe further said, that "it is now upto those
who had used the Dodd Report subjectively to cast aspersions on
the integrity on the Government of Sri Lanka and its investigative
processes, to retract their statements and in future not to leap
to unduly hasty conclusions, when not in possession of the full
facts."
|